Originally Posted by
chasm54
See my earlier post. I'm sure the distinction they would make is that the attack preceded the crash. But whether you agree with that or not, what goes around, comes around. Those who don't observe the conventions can't expect to benefit from them.
Sky showed pretty clearly in the Tour that they won't attack after a misfortuune has occurred, when Wiggins waited for Evans during the "tacks on the road" incident.
Well, if what goes around comes around, then Sky is in line for the same treatment.
To say it's poor form to capitalize on a rider's misfortune in one case, but then in the
same breath to say it is okay to capitalize on a rider's misfortune in another case is clearly
hypocritical.