Thread: 26" vs 700c
View Single Post
Old 08-12-05 | 05:33 AM
  #19  
Bizikleto's Avatar
Bizikleto
Enamoured of bicycles
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Huesca, NE Spain

Bikes: Oxia, bespoke comoly 29er all terrain tourer; 1993 Scott Boulder turned into 650b gravel; 2005 Maxx RoadMaxx; 2023 Kona Rove AL700

Being everything equal, the 700c is in theory and in practice faster. To which extent? It depends on the cyclist. Again, everything the same, 700c has lower rolling resistance and higher rotating momentum (both of them good for keeping high speeds, but not so much for accelerating); 26" has lower wind resistance (only for the front wheel; the rear one is behind wind drag of seat tube for all bikes) and weight, and lower center of gravity (better for quick and nimble swerves and wriggles). The outcome being that speed-wise the advantages of the 700c slightly outrun the 26"'s ones. I've ridden both, and the 700c is usually 1 to 2 mph faster with the same effort. Anyway, if you have to keep up with a group of fitness-matched people, wheel diameter won't matter much.

Last edited by Bizikleto; 08-12-05 at 05:39 AM.
Bizikleto is offline  
Reply