Originally Posted by
androidtt
Actually, if I recall correctly, the slower you are the more benefits there are to owning a aero wheelset. ex. Slow rider will notice a bigger jump in mph (or less wattage required) than a pro will because of all the opposing forces are multiplied at a higher speed. There's multiple discussions about this on slowtwitch with a more thorough explanation (equations, tests, etc.).
The slower cyclist will save more time over the same route from the aerodynamics. Watts at his same speed - a higher percentage perhaps if not more watts absolute. And a pound is a pound, slow rider or fast.
Either way, Drew Eckhardt has it right in this thread that rotational mass doesn't matter much. In a race, if you need six inches in a sudden charge, or need to stay inches close to wheel in front, yes. I can't say I've ever wanted that, not racing. He's also dead on that more aerodynamic wheels
will improve speed, but not so much that you'd notice.
The efficiency of a standard traditional hub (inexpensive) is so high that gains from ceramic bearings and exotic materials is by definition trivial. Because of the availability of parts and ease of repair, I think I'd prefer something like a decent shimano hub to an exotic expensive one even at the same price.
I kind of agree that if the shop noted that OP's bike was anything but a high end race bike (forget about the comfort saddle type depictions,
anything but top of the line racing) they'd know he would be disappointed in thousand dollar wheels. I can't fault the shop on this one.