Thread: Self Defense?
View Single Post
Old 09-03-12 | 11:42 AM
  #107  
wphamilton's Avatar
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,278
Likes: 342
From: Alpharetta, GA

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Originally Posted by RichardGlover
Axiom answered your question before you asked it - life in immediate danger. I believe he's wrong to state that he'd 'shoot to kill' - the appropriate mindset is to shoot to 'stop the threat'. It's unfortunate that the most effective method to do that is to shoot center-mass (shooting for legs, weapons, and other such stuff you see in the movies are woefully unrealistic)

I've carried both open and concealed. OC isn't so much a deterrent as it is a political statement. Not that there's anything wrong with political statements, but I prefer concealed.

Drawing from concealment isn't much slower. Plus, you potentially retain the advantage of (at least tactical) surprise.
Any bullet wound is potentially lethal, practically any part of the body you shoot at. I think, maybe, that's what people mean when referring to "shoot to kill". ie, that they're prepared for that person to die if they have to shoot. At least I hope so, and it's not some cowboy gunfighter fantasy thing.

Personally I think you're a lot safer having a weapon you don't brandish.
wphamilton is offline