View Single Post
Old 09-11-12 | 05:02 PM
  #28  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
ThermionicScott
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Originally Posted by Bat56
I am genuinely interested in what you are getting at. What did you mean by "portable?"
Just that the measurement is independent of enough details so that it's relevant no matter which bicycle you're looking at. As you'll agree, a straight ratio such as 48/16 is meaningless because that's a fairly tall gearing on a 29er, but not so tall on a folding bike. Gear inches takes the wheel diameter into account so that 56" on a high wheeler is comparable to 56" on a safety bicycle. I applaud Sheldon's efforts to factor crank length into the "effort" of bicycling, but without those details (the OP never posted them and hasn't returned), it just muddies the discussion. And like I posted before, if the OP had 170mm cranks on both his mountain bike and fixed-gear, it would be a moot point. Just to move between wheel sizes (as in your first post), all you need is gear inches. (Or meters-development, if you prefer metric...)
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply