Old 09-14-12, 07:53 AM
  #5  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,713

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times in 1,429 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
Hm, haven't come across this idea before; I thought it was enough for the teeth to miss each other. Could you say a bit more about the thinking behind it?
You want to avoid any direct interaction between the pulley and sprocket (through the chain). The pulley has to lead the chain onto the sprocket, and off when shifting. If the pulley is too close the chain's stiffness resists the motion of the pulley and increases the force needed to shift.

If you have a clothesline you can experiment derailing the rope. If you try from too far you have to push the rope sideways to get any action, but if you're too close you can't move the rope over the flange. The key is to be as close as possible, without being too close. On a derailleur, you'll find that happy medium to be with about 2 links of chain between them. BTW- it rou struggle through the Shimano adjustment data you'll see a similar guideline for "B" screw adjustment.

Direct contact though the chain must be avoided because it prevents the cage from rotating fully, and can push the RD off the B stop. That risks the entire RD being pushed back, and can cause a breakaway hanger to let go.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now