Originally Posted by
mechBgon
Actually, I see they used different geometry on the 1000C and the 1000T. Which one do you have? I'll cut and paste the specsheet for you as an image file.
wow, i thought the frames were the same, but the stem/seatpost were different.. I found the speck sheet online in pdf format, thanks for making me aware of it.
so i thought mine was a 1000c, because when i bought it the seatpost had a shock in it, but looking at the geometry and the different pictures on trek.com archives and bikepedia it's definitely the 1000c.. the top tube is totally flat, and it's the brushed steel with red highlights, not blue.
good to know, and i'm so glad i have the 1000T.. the geometry is very similar to my 2008 2.3 (which i enjoy very much).. the plan for now is to let them go ahead with the work and pray that it's not another really expensive lesson.. hoping for the best. thanks!
oh yea, and it's a 58cm. thanks!