Old 09-21-12, 02:39 PM
  #141  
Chief
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 379

Bikes: SR, Bianchi, Raleigh, Bertin, Kona, Schwinn, Eisentraut, Zunow, Columbine, Naked, Nishiki, Phillips, Specialized, Giant

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
state runs the scheme at state (tax-payer) expense. Basically just to shut up the motorists who claim cyclists aren't paying their fair share, but also providing cyclists with some kind of benefit -- both the registry aspect, but also some expectation that since they are paying for registration there's a more than currently in preponderance expectation that state and local constabulary will follow-up with theft investigations.

If a used bike buyer fails to carry out follow-up voluntary registration, well, that's on them, just like any sale should entail sales tax, but private, second-hand sales hardly ever bother.

Used bike sale registrations at the bike retail level would voluntary.
fify !
Chief is offline