View Single Post
Old 08-17-05 | 02:37 AM
  #15  
Raiyn's Avatar
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 15,061
Likes: 3
From: St. Petersburg, FL

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity

Originally Posted by Hopper
Basically yes, the torque created on the rear end can send feed back through the swing arm into the shock, it will either "squat" (compress into the trave) or "Jack" (Extend the travel) Both of these effects will partially lock the shock up in one way or another. However this isn't always a bad thing, some riders prefer this. Fabien Barrel rides a bike nptorious for having brake problems, however he has had a floating caliper put on his bike to increase the amount of Squat he gets.

Companies like Specialized are always going to be saying how much of aterrible thing it is, and how their bikes are totally neutral. This is a gross exaggeration, it can be good for the rider and the horst link hasn't totally eliminated the "problem"
Granted I'm a strong advocate of Specialized, but I'm setting that aside for now.
How exactly is the suspension locking up under braking or pedaling forces a "good" thing?

One would think (at least I would) that you would want pedal and brake forces to be completely seperate from suspension action. (Specialized may or may not be completely perfect but it's a damn sight closer than anyone else)
Also if it's not a "bad" thing why are the other companies trying to eliminate it through other designs and shock technologies?
__________________
Raiyn is offline  
Reply