Old 10-09-12 | 07:18 PM
  #22  
JohnJ80
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 253
From: Minnesota

Bikes: N+1=5

Originally Posted by rekmeyata
You could be right, but I remember people saying that when LED's first came out that they would never work because their too dim and HID was the future. I always think there's room for improvement, how much still remains to be seen. And the improvement to brighter tail lights will come with the improvement of battery technology.
Mmmm. I guess what I mean is that we are against a top end on the front of lights of about 4000 lumens - or about what you would get from two car headlights on full bright. On normal, they are about 2600 lumens. After that, there is no real need to go brighter on a bike, IMO. On the rear, it's probably about 400 lumens which is an amazingly bright taillight.

After that, it gets down to the feature wars - better mounts, smaller size, programmability, wireless remotes, beamshaping, better and smaller batteries etc.... It's sort of down to the point like with cars where we had the marketing battle over cupholders a few years ago.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Reply