Originally Posted by
Homebrew01
You guys are STILL missing part of the point. It's not that he doped, it's the level that he did it, the coercion, bullying, intimidation, threats ...... he seemed to be in a class of his own there. So even today you guys are apologists with "well, they all doped ..." blah blah .... gimme a break .....
This.
Originally Posted by
richard_dupp
So he was a bad guy and the rest were just collateral damage? They ALL doped with intent, he may have had a better program, but they are no lilies in this field.
No, they all didn't dope and some did it basically to keep their jobs so not the same thing. Also, even among those who did dope intentionally and willingly they didn't all have access to the same level of product or procedures. It was not a level playing field.