View Single Post
Old 10-24-12 | 11:10 PM
  #28  
cyclotoine's Avatar
cyclotoine
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,759
Likes: 19
From: Yukon, Canada
Originally Posted by oldskoolwrench
If it was an older fork, that's what the technology was back then; trying to balance ride quality with some level of longevity.

I don't have enough experience with the current crop of CF forks to know what their lifespan really is.

Glad you found the fork you wanted, though!
Indefinite. The old forks often had alloy crowns to and the carbon was wrapped up over them and quite thin. This construction method makes the transition from the crown to the thicker leg a stress point and I have seen several older carbon forks blades shear off at that junction. I wouldn't trust a used carbon fork with alloy steerer. I road a 350 g easton SC90SL carbon fork, and yeah it was more flexible and didn't feel as solid breaking, but I trusted it and it saved me about 500 g and that makes a difference going up hill.. it road really nice too when I wasn't out of the saddle on a steep grade. Descending was fine too.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Reply