Originally Posted by
John Forester
Since ILTB does not provide objections that are based on contrary facts, but you claim that he does, would you be so kind as to present what you think are the objections based on contrary facts that exist in ILTB's opposition to VC?
Interesting piece of argument. You're clearly not a scientist. Had you been, you'd know that all it takes to refute a theory is to show that its premises are false - for one reason or another, be that logically, statistically or whatever. "Contrary facts" in the form of alternative research or data is unnecessary.