View Single Post
Old 11-26-12 | 10:55 AM
  #15  
dalava
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 7
From: Northern VA

Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Colnago C60, Santa Cruz Stigmata CC, and too many other bikes I don't ride

Originally Posted by hhnngg1
Good runners won't be bad cyclists. They might not become great cyclists - running doesn't give enough benefit at the faster speeds/higher levels (like Cat1/2 and above) but they won't be bad.

Any runner who's cranking out 5ks in 17minutes or under, or running marathons in 2:45, will blow away almost all recreational cyclists with a mere 1-2 months of training, if not right out of the get-go. Marathon runners are also particularly good with distance - the limiting factor for them is usually butt or back pain, not leg endurance on long rides.

However, it's been shown pretty decisively in triathlon that great runners do not automatically become great cyclists. There are plenty of very fast marathon runners (like 6minute miles for the marathon) who migrate to ironman and expect to dominate but find they're just MOP due to their inability to really crush the bike at a similar level.
What you are saying is that Paul Ryan could kick some serious butt on the Mount Vernon trail...oh, never mind
dalava is offline  
Reply