Originally Posted by
Violet
I know this version now has "50" instead of "32" but... if you change it to 32 I think i would much rather fight 18 year old mike tyson than 32 year old mike tyson. Athletes often reach their peak around that age...
of course I'd rather you gave me a bicycle so I could cycle away from mike tyson.
Originally Posted by
SHOFINE
You must don't know the history of Mike Tyson....wrong fighter for this analogy. He was the best at the age 18 (youngest champ @ 20) in the history of Heavyweight Boxing for sure! (washed up @ 32)
All Tyson history aside...
Any 18 year old athlete has more stamina and endurance than any 32+ athlete!
He may have less skill for certain, but most certainly not less stamina. The type of natural, non-chemical-assisted-stamina, and cardio-endurance, necessary for all dem dadblasted ascents in cycling.
