View Single Post
Old 11-27-12 | 08:26 AM
  #38  
hhnngg1
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,455
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by StanSeven
Without looking up specific data from my training logs and spreadsheets, I remember one marathon three years ago and my 10K split was around 42'. A few weeks earlier I barely broke 40' in a 10K.
Then you're running substantially faster at 10k than the marathon. 6:26 for 10k vs 6:58 for the marathon. That's very close to exactly what you're 'supposed' to be running for 10k vs marathon according the Mcmillan's calculator. That's not even close to the same pace.
hhnngg1 is offline  
Reply