View Single Post
Old 12-05-12 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
ModeratedUser150120149
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by unterhausen
it's a little ridiculous that cops try to get away with saying they have to witness an offense. How many shoplifting incidents have they witnessed? That would be a ridiculous standard for their involvement. We might as well get rid of them if that was the case.
I think this is a wee bit misstated. My understanding is they have to witness the act or evidence for them to file the complaint and take a person into custody. But they can also take a person into custody based on citizen complaint. Then they are just acting on behalf of the shopkeeper or cyclist or whoever.

But, then YOU are the one on the hook. Best be sure what you are doing before you deprive a person of their liberty and cause them inconvenience and expense. The other person has legal rights too and if you aren't sure and willing to take it all the way you might find yourself in a big blowback situation.


I asked about how the bike camera would work. At this point those who so loudly proclaimed how this would be a game changer seem to have faded into the mist. We are left with the idea that when the idea of cameras is thought through it is just one more tool and depends on the willingness of a cyclist to step forward in the legal system.

Last edited by ModeratedUser150120149; 12-05-12 at 12:07 PM.
ModeratedUser150120149 is offline  
Reply