Finally some truth. No physiologist has any doubt that LA dopes, and is connected to the US olympic meds program initiated by Nike in the early 80s. This was admitted by an ex US postal physiologist.

I find it hilarious that American track athletes show up to meets 10-15kg more muscle mass and V02 off scale and attribute it to good diet and Gatorade.

According to the NFL, no one dopes ..LOL...

By the way, EPO is tolerated by the UCI, just not above certain levels (it is a natural hormone). However, the French press has made it a cheap business to accuse Armstrong of doping, these accusations will never make the US press because the slander laws are different in the US. There is no real proof of doping with Armstrong, now there never will be. Euro press is usually just trash anyway, they love to demonize heros in Europe, they're sh--ting all over Michael Schumacher right now, last year he was a god. You will not see those articles in US press because Armstrong has several slander lawyers on retainer that are aggressive at court orders and lawsuits. He has to do this or his future in any career is shot.

WADA has several new biochemical tests, some of which are still secret, and these will cause some big surprises in 2006. But, they are also going wayyy overboard with some crappy tests, like the one they used on Hamilton (who I am not convinced doped), and the dumb idea that they will ban caffeine in 2006.

There is only one way to fix this. Allow doping at fixed levels. They already do this with EPO. We all know that cyclists don't use steriods, it doesn't help them. They dope to increase oxygen levels and deal with lactic acid.

But, to say that Armstrong didn't use enhancements is just cognitive denial, either that, or there is a new era of human evolution starting in Plano Texas.