Old 12-30-12 | 12:22 PM
  #19  
jyl's Avatar
jyl
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 68
From: Portland OR

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Originally Posted by repechage
I think that the "flick-ability" of the Cannondale may be the front center dimension, not the frame size of the seat tube, and maybe the head angle too.

From your description, I would look at some frames from the late 40's or 50's, often they have much longer top tubes than what was to come in the 60's and 70's. The 80's was shorter still for a given frame size, I am making generalizations here but bikes have been getting shorter over the decades.
Why have top tubes been getting shorter? I understand modern hoods protrude a bit farther than old hoods, but that can't be the main reason?

I've also been told to look at older LeMonds.
jyl is offline  
Reply