Old 01-10-13, 03:28 PM
  #976  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,305

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1451 Post(s)
Liked 731 Times in 374 Posts
Originally Posted by Cat4Lifer
Had he and every other racer refrained from using, I'm confident he still would have been or at least nearly as succcessful as he was. Sure I believe he "cheated" (used PEDs), but I also believe that about nearly every other pro.
No one will ever know of course. My bet is Armstrong would have been very successful, likely still the most successful of his generation. However, I think it's highly likely he would have won fewer TDF's and almost certainly not 7 in a row.

2 reasons: 1) The very sophisticated doping program Armstrong had going limited competition from others with less resources.

2) Steroids, Transfusions, and EPO, made it a lot easier to get through a Tour without bad days. Riders are more consistent on PED's and with the benefit of boosted transfusions. Take those away, and the odds that Armstrong cracks one day, and loses one of those tours go up substantially.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline