View Single Post
Old 01-31-13 | 02:47 PM
  #38  
loubapache's Avatar
loubapache
Full Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 6
From: Western MI

Bikes: 2015 Windsor Oxford; 2012 Trek T900; 2008 Iron Horse Commuter; 1999 Specialized Stumpjumper M2 Pro; 1999 Kona Lava Dome; 1992 Trek 520 Tour; 1980 Fuji Grand Tour SE; 1973 Raleigh LTD-3; 1956 Robin Hood; 198x Worksman Industrial Trike

Originally Posted by Steely Dan
an unfendered small wheel folder is considerably messier in the rain than an unfendered full-size bike at equivalent speeds.
There is a lot of truth to that and it can be explained with physics.

Assuming everything being equal (mainly the friction/adhesion force of the mud on the tire but this is a complicated function of rubber compound, tread design, mud wetness and even mud composition).

Assume the big wheel and the small wheel are traveling with the same linear speed, v, (such as 10 mph).

Mud can only stay on the tire if there is enough centripetal force, which is provided by the friction/adhesion force.

For the same linear speed, the mud on the smaller wheel needs to have a higher centripetal force to stay on because

Centripetal force = m * v^2 / R, where

m is the mass of the mud (same for both big and small wheel),
v is the linear speed (same for both big and small wheel),
R is the radius of the tire (smaller for the small wheel).

So the requirement for the centripetal force is greater for the small wheel, the mud cannot "make the cut" so it flies off along the tangent.

So it is like you have $100 so you can only buy a Wal-Mart blue light special for $88. The LBS $980 deal will fly you off along the tangent. Not everyone will be riding a LBS bike.

Last edited by loubapache; 01-31-13 at 02:53 PM.
loubapache is offline  
Reply