View Single Post
Old 03-04-13 | 07:17 AM
  #58  
jyl's Avatar
jyl
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 68
From: Portland OR

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Originally Posted by hamster
I profoundly disagree. A deer has more area than a cyclist who's riding in the same direction as the driver, and it is gray rather than black. A sufficiently dirty bicycle has no shiny bits at all. It is a fact that a cyclist dressed in all black with no lights or reflectors is quite hard to see, even when he is within the range of the headlights.

News story with a video: http://www.ksat.com/news/Bicyclist-s...1/-/index.html

You can't see a whole lot except that the road is almost pitch black, with no lighting whatsoever, and the car is stopped in the fast lane, with the bicycle (or something that looks like a bicycle) wedged underneath. The exact location where the car is stopped appears to be a bridge over a small creek on the edge between 5900 and 6000 blocks. The car was westbound and there is an unlit T-intersection with a side road (Barden Gate) about 450 feet east. It is probable that the cyclist was crossing the road at that intersection when he was hit.
450 feet is a long distance - 1 and 1/2 football fields. If you and I saw the same news video, the body (at least, something laying on the road, covered in white) is about 30 feet behind the stopped car. If he was hit at the intersection, seems both body and car should have come to a stop in less than 420-450 feet.
jyl is offline  
Reply