Originally Posted by
contango
If someone can only afford a very basic BSO to get around should they wait until they can afford two, in case the first one gets stolen? In principle I'd agree with the approach of not buying something so expensive (whatever "expensive" means based on your specific financial circumstances) that you'd be ruined if anything happened to it. That said the problems of having a bike rendered inoperable (whether it's stolen, critical parts are stolen or it's vandalised or otherwise damaged) are often far beyond the financial cost of replacing or fixing it. Not least because it leaves you away from home with your transport home removed. Where I live that would just be annoying as I could take the train home, and the station is barely a mile on foot from home. For those in more rural areas it becomes a much bigger problem.
As far as my fiscal constraint comment, I think people shouldn't be buying a bike until that have at least 12 months of net salary saved in the US or 6 months in Europe (due to differences in the unemployment insurance). At which point, I'd still hesitate to spend more than 20% of a month's net salary on a commuting bike (this is the commuting forum, right?).
Hope that clarifies my perspective.