Thread: Handlebar Width
View Single Post
Old 03-20-13 | 02:12 PM
  #33  
grolby's Avatar
grolby
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,872
Likes: 152
From: BOSTON BABY
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/gear/ar...h-issue-34169/
http://blog.centurycycles.com/2009/0...do-i-need.html

What you said goes against the people in the know...unless you can share knowledge that exceeds them and the prevailing thoughts of the last 50 years or more, which echo my experiences, though my experiences don't mean much.
No, it doesn't. Read more carefully. Wider handlebars mean you have more leverage over the front wheel. That's it. They don't make the bike "more twitchy." They allow easier resistance to unintended or external control inputs, like wind, or the inertia of a load on the bike, etc. Absent those factors, which are important, bar width isn't relevant to handling and having wider bars means an unintentional pull on the bar has a greater effect. The front-end geometry of a bike is what determines its handling, everything else is secondary at best.

Originally Posted by Ferrous Bueller
Two hands on the bar is a very different proposition than one. When slinging, the objective is to not steer the bike.
A better model is modern mountain bikes. The greater the need for stability, the wider the bars seem to get.
See above. The confusion here is about what is meant by "stability." Call me crazy, but I consider stability to be a relative lack of response to steering input - being able to do a madison sling means you're very stable. What you're referring to with mountain bike bars isn't about what I would consider stability, it's about fine control and high leverage over the front wheel.
grolby is offline  
Reply