View Single Post
Old 03-23-13, 10:58 PM
  #77  
rekmeyata
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,683

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times in 199 Posts
Originally Posted by Burton
OK - lets say that's true. That in itself doesn't mean they won't stand up for years. Thing is, sponsored riders are given every possible advantage by the companies sponsoring them, which can improve every year, which can result in new frames being used every season. Which doesn't mean the frames retired were defective or damaged - just no longer quite as competative.

Its surprising the things that are considered 'obsolete' when you start measuring performance to three decimal places.

We need more sports measured by 'FUN FACTOR' and not a stopwatch.
The thought I was trying to convey was that a pro racer is not as concerned about breaking a expensive CF mtb frame as we would be because the sponsoring bike company just hands over a new bike, we get handed a bill.
rekmeyata is offline