View Single Post
Old 04-06-13, 04:28 PM
  #8  
Continuity
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NW UK
Posts: 418

Bikes: 1992 Marin Eldridge Grade, 2007 Kona PHD and 199? Trek 1000 (current build project)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
30.9 millimetres = 1.21653543 inches

You know, I understand the imperial/metric situation, but how on Earth did we end up with the situation where there are just so many different seat-post sizes?

Or is that just a 'metricated' version of 1.2" in this particular case?

Surely tube manufacturers like Reynolds et al, if they have been making tube-sets specifically for bicycles for years, would have benefited from using just a few standard, more rounded sizes than the plethora that exist now?

Edit: Doh. I found out, and it's pretty obvious now I think about it - it's all because the seatpost has to fit down the *inside* diameter of the seat tube, which can vary because of the different buttings etc. used over the years as tubing has evolved.

Last edited by Continuity; 04-06-13 at 04:43 PM.
Continuity is offline