View Single Post
Old 04-12-13 | 11:29 AM
  #19  
Cfiber
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by old's'cool
Andy_K, I agree with your sentiments, but, by way of clarification, according to the Surly catalog, the LHT frame alone weighs about 5 lb; the fork is an additional 2 lb or so. That's pretty respectable in my book, considering the bike's intent. I do not know the apportioning of weight between frame & fork of CF bikes, as they don't interest me much.
My payload for commuting has been north of 20lb sometimes, so for me the weight savings of a high end frame is fairly pointless; I could get more benefit by just paring down my payload, if I wanted to. But, since a large part of the reason I bike commute is exercise, there's little incentive to go all weight-weenie on my commuter bikes. Of course speed is also a consideration, but +/- a few pounds on a gross weight in the vicinity of 200lb does not lend itself to a measurable difference in total elapsed time. Putting it another way, there's a lot more to be gained speedwise, at least in my case, by improving and/or lightening the "engine" than by incremental weight reduction of the bike + equipment.
Yeah, I hear ya! I could lose about 20-25 lbs. to achieve my ideal body weight.

Also, though speed is a concern in my book, comfort trumps speed every time. Therefore, I think I'm going to stick with the touring bike concept. I don't care if I arrive several seconds later than everyone else, as long as I enjoy the ride.

Thanks

Last edited by Cfiber; 04-12-13 at 11:32 AM.
Cfiber is offline  
Reply