Old 04-19-13 | 04:25 PM
  #20  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,864
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by cny-bikeman

FB's comment is not a technical fact but a judgement, but one built on the practical experience of seeing those consequences - as I have. There is no good reason to fail to allow the chain to reach that combo.
Actually it's more than a judgement. Whether the risk of potential damage is acceptable is a personal judgement, but there have been published guidelines for chain length for over half a century. The Sram method of big/big +1" is the minimum safe length. Both Shimano and Campagnolo guidelines would have you using a longer chain in most cases.

What anyone does with his own chain is none of my business, but if an employee ever set up a customers bike with a chain shorter than the minimum length, he'd get a clear warning the first time and be fired the second time. In the same vein, I consider it an issue of responsibility to clearly advise anyone who asks, that chains shorter than minimum are bad practice. What they do with that advice is up to them.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply