Old 04-25-13, 08:13 AM
  #41  
staehpj1
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,905

Bikes: Several

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 769 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Niles H.
The fuel itself is still heavier -- over twice as heavy -- regardless of the length of the tour. It is inherently considerably heavier. Literally so.
The fuel's weight is not as relevant as the total combined weight of the stove, fuel, and fuel container that needs to be carried at any given time. Also it is time between restock that matters not trip length. That total weight works out to be less for alcohol for me for in the neighborhood of 10 days or less between restock and lighter for other fuels for longer than ten days or so between restocking. That assumes my typical usage, the time period where it advantage shifts would be different for different usage patterns.

So yes the fuel is heavier per btu, but whether the load carried is heavier is a different matter and the one that actually matters.
staehpj1 is offline