View Single Post
Old 04-30-13 | 03:35 PM
  #27  
Roody's Avatar
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,192
Likes: 13
From: Dancing in Lansing
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
See The Triumph of Suburbia: Despite Downtown Hype, Americans Choose Sprawl http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...se-sprawl.html

A lame rebuttal is found here: http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/...ut_prices.html

"Lame" because it equates high price per lot with population growth/movement trends and population desires and preferences.
You evidently missed one main point of Yglesias's "lame" rebuttal:

— Population growth is fastest in cheap land areas.The fourth fact really is important. If you want to tell an analytically correct story about the future of America, the story is that more and more people will be living in suburbs of large and medium-sized cities in Texas. But to focus on the fourth fact without noting the other three is missing the boat. It's like saying nobody wants to buy a Lexus, or gorgeous Caribbean beach resorts in February suck. Luxury goods aren't unpopular, they're just expensive. San Francisco is expensive. Manhattan is expensive. Logan Circle, where I live, is expensive. But the difference is that policymakers actually have the ability to make it possible for many more people to live in these expensive places, they simply choose not to do so.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/...ut_prices.html
Remember, cities are not expensive (or crowded) because nobody wants to live there. They are expensive because more people want to live there than can fit in.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Reply