View Single Post
Old 05-13-13 | 09:40 AM
  #33  
Biker395's Avatar
Biker395
Seat Sniffer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,903
Likes: 3,036
From: SoCal

Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport

I've had people make all kinds of ridiculous claims about CF components:

"Yea ... my bike used to ride really harsh when I had an aluminum seatpost. With the CF seatpost, it's really plush."

Plush? With something as stiff as CF and 90% loaded in compression? Compared to the compliance of the tires, the seat, and the seat suspension? Balderdash.

I had an straight gauge aluminum bike (with an aluminum fork too) and switched to a CF fork. My take on it? The difference is that when you go over a bump, the CF fork goes BONG where the Al fork would have gone BANG. That's about it. It's not like you'll get more vertical compliance out of the part ... you won't. But the vibrations don't "ring" as much.

That being said, the BANG versus BONG difference isn't terribly significant for short rides. But when you're talking about long rides on crappy roads, it does add up.

YMMV.
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...

Biker395 is offline  
Reply