Old 05-18-13 | 10:08 AM
  #15  
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 7
From: NA

Bikes: NA

Originally Posted by B. Carfree
I'm inclined to agree. A repaving/restriping project is slated for my neighborhood this Spring. I got involved with the city traffic engineer and the city traffic planner last Spring when they were deciding what this "neighborhood collector" would look like when they finished. The president of the local bike club, a copenhagenista, also got involved. He pushed hard for an extended section of cylcletrack on this road that averages four or five driveways on each side (mostly serving multi-unit housing) per 366-foot block. Needless to say, that would have been a nightmare from a safety standpoint; it would have been similar to the current situation where many of the cyclists ride on the sidewalks.

Fortunately, in the end we got the traffic engineer to remove the parking on one side (a decision that is currently under appeal) in order to remove the door zone problem from one side and to then put a small buffer hatch between the parking and the other bike lane (8-foot parking, 2-foot hatch, 5-foot bike lane).
Angry e-mails flew every which way that only subsided after the residents were surveyed and showed an overwhelming enthusiasm (91% support) for the parking removal and bike lane buffering. Yeah, it was a battle.

This is a recurring theme in portland. The new cycle track on NE multnomah is a safety and engineering disaster. (Agent pombero and I were discussing it here on the fresh meat thread.) The willingness of copenhagenistas to build and promote infrastructure where cyclists are hidden behind a wall of parked cars prior to unsignaled intersections is infuriating. This type of unsafe infrastructure is a huge step backward.
spare_wheel is offline  
Reply