Gene, now you're back to issue 2. Are you saying that now that you've given it some thought, you now that being hit from elsewhere is much more likely to kill you while you are cycling than is being hit from behind in daylight, and the statement is not BS or a fallacy?
Al, are you saying you disagree with the statement without modification?
The statement being... Being hit from elsewhere is much more likely to kill you while you are cycling than is being hit from behind in daylight.
Do you agree that hits-from-behind-in-daylight kill far fewer cyclists than do hits-from-elsewhere (any hit other than a hit-from-behind-in-daylight)?
If so, is it not then true, by definition, that being hit from elsewhere is much more likely to kill you while you are cycling than is being hit from behind in daylight?