Originally Posted by
tjspiel
It's the second part that I question is really true. Let's say you were to hand out a survey out to people who lived within 10 miles of work and asked them to rank the reasons why they don't commute by bike, my guess is that spandex would be pretty low on the list if it shows up at all. Here's what I think you are more likely to see:
It would take too long
I often have to travel to other locations while at work
I wouldn't feel safe
What if it rains/snows, etc?
It's dark when I go into or come home from work
I have to drop the kids off at daycare/school or run other errands
I need to look good and there's no shower facilities
It's too much work
As far as spandex goes, I think most people are smart enough to realize that it's optional. It's not like we put our kids in bike shorts and jerseys before we let them get on a bike. Most adults have ridden in regular clothes plenty of times.
completely, utterly, totally agreed!
this whole notion that helmets and spandex are the two big dams holding back the floodwater of tens of millions of motorists converting to bike riders seems really silly to me.
here it is in a nutshell:
if you want to wear a helmet........................... then wear a freaking helmet, idiot.
if you don't want to wear a helmet.................... then don't wear a freaking helmet, moron.
if you want to wear spandex............................ then wear freaking spandex, idiot.
if you don't want to wear spandex..................... then don't wear freaking spandex, moron.
this is not hard. it's really, REALLY,
REALLY simple.
STFUARYB!