Originally Posted by spare wheel
non-separated infrastructure
you need to get your planning warrants straight: those two meter wide, buffered bikelanes you suggest as your preffered alternative physically separate bike and car traffic to the greatest extent possible. -although now you couch your suggestions with the idea that
Originally Posted by spare wheel
Cycle tracks are desirable when speed or traffic density can only be mitigated by increased separation.Given the high-speed of vehicle traffic on Foster, a properly-designed cycle track would have been a good option.
so you're for the cycle track, not the buffered bike lane. okay. your position on Foster is cycle track, not buffered bikelane. got it.
ah, so if portland had sufficient budget for bike transportation, you're for cycle tracks on a lot of the major arterial roads like foster seen across portland! cycle tracks on the busy roads. a good plan, spare wheel. Gee- i wonder if there's any movement towards that model of bike planning going on in Portland right now?
nice flag, did you bleach it this morning?
--------------------
you not going to see your plan of 'bikes may use full traffic lane' next to a two meter buffered bikelane in portland. *traffic separation*