View Single Post
Old 06-22-13 | 09:22 PM
  #11  
sfrider's Avatar
sfrider
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 203
From: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Originally Posted by kv501
If you're looking for consistency, the corrected elevations are better data. I think one of the reasons everybody hates the corrected elevation is because most of the time (in my experience) it's lower than what their Garmin reads. Everyone wants to believe he/she really climbed 5,000 feet so they bash the lower number.
You should try ridewithgps.com - their corrected elevation data is like EPO! On a 85mi ride the other day (Thu) my 510 said 8600 ft; ridewithgps.com says 9700. God, I love that service.
sfrider is offline  
Reply