View Single Post
Old 07-09-13 | 10:08 AM
  #219  
cooker's Avatar
cooker
Prefers Cicero
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,860
Likes: 146
From: Toronto

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
The points I'm trying to make are much more specific:
• Foot retention does not increase power to the drivetrain.
• Foot retention does not fix a poor pedal stroke.
• The data is very clear: You don't apply power on the upstroke.
• The advantages of foot retention are about control and ride feel.
Okay, so I see part of the problem here. "Pulling up" increases delivery of power to the drive train, because more muscles are at work. However, perhaps you are saying that the driving force is still being applied on the downstroke, and all that the pulling up is doing is lessening the deadweight on the upward bound pedal. However, even if that is always true (which is dubious) you are still delivering more power to the bike, and going faster (for the moment, until you get tired or acidotic).
cooker is offline  
Reply