View Single Post
Old 07-09-13 | 09:38 PM
  #275  
gregf83
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 289
From: Vancouver, BC
Objective, n=1 data

Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
And no one has given a biomechanical reason why all that data, collected under different conditions, that all produce the same force curves, has relevance whatsoever to sprinting.

Is it the rider position? Cadence? Levels of power output? Anaerobic or max effort?
Don't know the reason but to advance the science (BS) a little bit I went out this evening and compared riding clipless with platforms. I did the same route and efforts, first with a set of platforms, followed by clipless pedals. I used an SRM to record power and zeroed the meter before each set of tests. I did this with an open mind and went all out on the sprints and steep hill. (I'm 50+ and not a sprinter so no wisecracks please)

For normal steady riding I didn't find any noticeable difference. My foot obviously moves around more with platforms and I don't find it as comfortable but I wouldn't have any issue doing a long ride with the platforms. The sprints were, on average, about 200w less with the platforms and the steep hill about 150w less.

One of the most noticeable differences was just starting out from a stop. With the platforms I couldn't go much above 400w but with the clipless I routinely start out briefly around 500-600w and it was very easy to feel the difference in pulling up. Not a big deal but I suspect this is why track sprinters need their feet firmly locked to the pedals.

Results are summarized below:

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Pedal Comparison (800x177).jpg (31.2 KB, 35 views)

Last edited by gregf83; 07-10-13 at 11:10 AM.
gregf83 is offline  
Reply