Originally Posted by
slowride454
I've never believed in the BMI scale. ...
I will never be "normal". At 5' 11", the top of normal is 178 pounds. I wrestled in college at 167 and about 5% body fat. I continued to lift and exercise for a while after an injury ended my wrestling days. ....
I recently got a skin fold test done and I am actually 18%. This puts my lean body mass at 180 pounds. So unless I lop off a limb, I will not get down to normal.
My goal is a healthy lifestyle and about 12-15% body fat. Body composition is much more important than the numbers on a scale.
Your own assumptions are a bit flawed. As you lose weight, it is almost impossible to retain all of your lean body mass (muscle)... you'll lose some of that too. So, you don't have to worry about "lopping off a limb." (and skin fold tests are less accurate than BMI - they can be off by 2% to 10% depending on the experience of the practitioner performing the test and taking the measurements.)
BMI is a "guideline." However, I believe it is a fairly accurate guideline. About the only groups that I believe it does not pertain too are fit bodybuilders and highly trained athletes that obviously are lean and possess a lot of strength (football running backs come to mind.) For the rest of us, it's a difficult job to try and justify why it wouldn't accurately classify us into an appropriate group... morbidly obese, obese, overweight, normal, or underweight. BMI isn't the only gauge I use to assess my fitness (or lack of it) but it's still a very useful tool.