View Single Post
Old 07-29-13, 11:18 PM
  #525  
DGlenday
Senior Member
 
DGlenday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,248

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by David Bierbaum
Here's a question I'm pondering. Is it worth it to bother taking pictures in RAW format? It takes longer to take the picture, and it takes longer to do myself what the camera does automatically. I like the color in RAW better, but is it enough better to warrant spending the half hour to hour tweaking it to be just right, when the jpeg is "good enough?"

Here's a sample, courtesy of the model who obligingly posed for me, on the bush I clipped yesterday.
Over-simplification follows:

Raw is definitely worth while IF you don't mind spending a lot of time on photoshop, turning a good pic into a perfect pic.

If not - there's little real advantage.

(Also - Raw is particularly good at handling a wider contrast.)
DGlenday is offline