Bike Forums - View Single Post - Skinny or fat tires for my commuter?

08-06-13 | 12:11 PM

#12

AusTexMurf

Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 919

Likes: 15

From: South Austin, Texas

Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...

I would try these in the 32's, based on your riding conditions.
I have had excellent results with the panaracer urban/touring tires in 700c size.

[h=2]RIBMO PT[/h]RiBMo is the newest addition to our urban tire line. Aside from a plethora of sizes, the news on RiBMo is PT puncture resistance technology. PT delivers 3x the puncture resistance of Aramid belted technologies.
[TABLE="width: 313"]
[TR]
[TH]SIZES[/TH]
[TH]BEAD[/TH]
[TH]ETRO[/TH]
[TH]TPI[/TH]
[TH]WEIGHT[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 23c[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]23-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]300g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 25c[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]25-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]330g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 28c[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]28-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]370g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 32c[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]32-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]400g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 35c[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]35-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]490g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]26 x 1.25[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]32-559[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]330g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]26 x 1.50[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]38-559[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]440g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]26 x 1.75[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]42-559[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]490g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]26 x 2.0[/TD]
[TD]Aramid[/TD]
[TD]48-559[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]540g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 23c[/TD]
[TD]Steel[/TD]
[TD]23-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]360g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 25c[/TD]
[TD]Steel[/TD]
[TD]25-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]390g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 28c[/TD]
[TD]Steel[/TD]
[TD]28-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]420g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700 x 32c[/TD]
[TD]Steel[/TD]
[TD]32-622[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]450g.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Reply

0