View Single Post
Old 08-13-13 | 10:27 AM
  #14  
old's'cool's Avatar
old's'cool
curmudgineer
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 113
From: Chicago SW burbs

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Originally Posted by John E
I concur with everything in this post except the brake caliper length. Most English, and many Japanese, bikes of that era came w/ 610 length brakes in front and 750 in back.
That is certainly true of my mid-1970s Raleigh Gran Sport. I think it makes good sense; more cable stretch between rear lever and rear caliper compared with the front; and maximum usable braking torque (before skidding) for rear wheel is less than the front.
And, for those with a wont to run larger tire and perhaps even correspondingly larger fender in the rear than the front, the longer reach brake may be an enabler.
In summary, I see a certain elegance to staggering brake reach front-to-rear, not to mention other parameters.
old's'cool is offline  
Reply