View Single Post
Old 08-18-13 | 06:15 PM
  #15  
Beaker's Avatar
Beaker
moth -----> flame
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,919
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: 18 Tarmac SL6, 11 CAAD 10-4, 07 Specialized Roubaix Comp, 98 Peugeot Horizon

Originally Posted by canam73
Ftp and watts/kg are usually referenced in relation to a set interval or hill climb. These are almost never longer than an hour. I guess you can compare normalized power or its derivatives, but it really only makes sense for specific rides.
Originally Posted by DaveWC
Why would you use NP vs avg power? I'm doing better on the 2 & 3 hour rides if I use NP so I'm all for it.
Agreed with this, I don't see W/kg used for NP values, since NP is an algorithm that is applied to your power curve for a given ride that weights/rewards the higher outputs over the lower ones. NP is fine on it's own, but it's derived from a measured value, rather than being a measured value itself.
__________________
BF, in a nutshell
Beaker is offline  
Reply