Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,286
Likes: 317
From: Lake Geneva, WI
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Originally Posted by
mm718
Since neither rear tire (Supreme or Hyper) would likely last across the TransAm (4200 miles) would it make sense to take the Hypers to benefit from better rolling and ride quality and plan on replacing the tires when needed. I'll be carrying a spare so I could change the rear at roughly the half-way point and then have another folding tire mailed to me to be my spare and replacement for the front when and if needed.
Yes, this is a solid plan. The Supreme is better than most touring tires in terms of speed and comfort, but the Hyper is still enough of an improvement over the Supreme that I'd be willing to carry a spare and replace the faster wearing Hyper. Having a spare has plenty of merit. Both the Supreme and Hyper fold into a tight ball and are easy to pack and carry. You never know when some unexpected hazard will damage a tire beyond repair while touring.
The Hyper is not only faster rolling with a supple ride, It also provides a little more traction on wet pavement and on all gravel. With the Supreme, I know the tire has limits, and I'll slow to maintain traction in wet conditions. The Hyper feels very secure on wet pavement or gravel as long at the surface isn't greasy from vehicle oil or from damp topsoil.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Last edited by Barrettscv; 08-31-13 at 12:17 PM.