View Single Post
Old 09-05-13 | 11:10 AM
  #87  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 43,974
Likes: 6,152
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

cyccommute, it's true that dyno lights can and do fail. The failure rate is less. Less than an admittedly low failure rate of battery lights. The difference is significant for me but not for you. Similarly, the difference in cost is significant for you but not for me. We are weighing our parameters differently.

I would not suggest a dyno system on every bike to a person who frequently rides many bikes. My racing bike, which I use on long, fun rides, often with friends, doesn't have any lights mounted to them until I take a ride, and of course, they are battery lights. One of my errand bikes has battery lights. Clearly, I find them useful and worth the money for some uses. I prefer dyno systems on my two most frequently used errand bikes. So I'm not a purist. My point is that dyno lights have some advantages, so it's a good choice for some of us, some of the time. The light provided is completely adequate, the price is reasonable (and that's an opinion), and the convenience is great.

I hope I've put this stuff in a way that you can agree with or respect. I don't mean to attack your views at all. I think mine are stout enough not to need to be attacked, either.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply