Originally Posted by
daihard
I'm debating whether to get progressive (i.e. no-line bifocal) lenses for my bike rides. That's what my regular pair of glasses has, but I'm wondering if the "near" portion is really needed when riding. If I can get away with monofocal lenses, I can probably save quite a bit of money.
I agree with the others.
When actually riding along? Meh. Not a biggie.
But stop to change a tube, go into a store, or read a map? That's when I need them.
In case you didn't know, there are differences between each make and model of progressive lens. On the bike, I really, really like Carl Zeiss GT2 lenses. Mine are polarized too. The sharpness and clarity in the upper part of the lens is fantastic, even when looking off to the side. Very little astigmatic distortion, so much less point-your-nose for distance.
If expense is an issue, just get lined.