View Single Post
Old 09-18-13 | 08:47 PM
  #25  
cyccommute's Avatar
cyccommute
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,111
Likes: 6,141
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by Ronno6
Umm...........What?
The spokes traverse from the hub to the rim in a straight line, and direction relative to each other depends on the pattern in which they are laced.
You got the straight line right but you are missing the point. There is no "pattern" to a radially laced wheel other than right then left. The spokes are radial. They can go in one direction...straight from the hub to the rim. As simple as possible.

Originally Posted by Ronno6
If the spokes are laced radially and staggered correctly, the resulting spoke path will radiate directly from the axle center to a perpendicular intersection with a tangent to the rim arc at the spoke hole.
A simple concept that is wordy to explain. In essence, there will be no angle at the hub or the rim.
If they to not traverse on a directly radial path, it is because they were not laced to do so.
Yep. The spokes travel from the hub to the rim in a straight, perpendicular line. If spoke #1 goes from the hub to the rim radially, then spoke #2 , spoke #3 , spoke #4 , etc. will all go in the same straight line. I don't see any crossed spokes in the pictures so there isn't any other way to lace the wheel.

Originally Posted by Ronno6
Twisting the hub of a correctly laced radially spokes wheel cannot be kept in that orientation after tensioning.
Tensionong the spokes would straighten things up in a hurry if the spokes were in fact laced radially.
It should but for some reason it didn't. I see the reason and I'll present it in a second.

Originally Posted by Ronno6
The OP's wheel exhibits a pattern in which the stagger between flanges is not radially laced;
but, rather, the spokes pull in opposite directions (as in a typical cross-laced pattern, just to a lesser degree) resulting in the slight angle.
However, even in a cross pattern laced wheel, the spoke from a trailing staggered flange hole would traverse to a trailing hole in the rim.
The pattern used on the OP's wheel laces the spokes from the trailing staggered hub flange holes to holes in the rim that lead the spokes that they trailed at the hub. Viewing photo #1 shows the spokes pulling in opposite directions. This is the reason why.
Simple as that.
It is simple but not for the reasons that you are saying.

Originally Posted by Ronno6
I am not saying that it is right or wrong; it simply is not a true radial pattern.
It may have been designed precisely that way.
Nope. Not designed that way. It a simple building error. Look at the first attached picture. Start counting from the valve stem clockwise. At spokes 12 and 13, you'll see that the two right hand spokes are attached to the same side instead of the correct left/right pattern. Spokes 14 and 15 are also both on the same side.

SumoMuffin: Detension the wheel. Swap what is now spoke 14 with spoke 13, so that you have one spoke running from the right and one running from the left. This should straighten out the hub.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is online now  
Reply