View Single Post
Old 09-19-13 | 07:46 AM
  #28  
cyccommute's Avatar
cyccommute
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,209
Likes: 6,285
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by Ronno6
Just look at picture #2 . Spokes from opposite flanges cross paths.
Take,for example, the near flange heads up spoke at 12 o'clock.
The spoke in the far flange is in the flange hole immediately clockwise from the near spoke, but traverses to the rim
hole immediately COUNTERclocksise of the referenced spoke.
The paths visually cross right about at the diameter change of the spokes.
Obviously the stagger is incorrect for a true radial pattern.
Had the spoke in the far flange been laced to the hole immediately clockwise to the reference spoke,
the paths would be parallel and result in a true radial lacing pattern.

Simple.
There are no crossed spokes on the same side of the hub. When talking about spoke crossing, I've never heard anyone talk about spoke crossing on opposite sides of the hub.

Yes, the solution is simple. I've already discussed why and how to fix it. Read my post and look at the picture. It's clear once you look at spokes 12 through 14. You are just making it harder than it really is.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply