Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike

And the modified claim of significant reduction, or ANY Change at all, is just as unsupported and without any credible or tangible evidence.

You may wish to associate the conjured success rate of your favorite bicycling education with the actual success of a nationwide anti drunk driving campaign, but your wish and speculation does not substitute for facts and evidence.


You can ask your dang questions a zillion times if you like. I usually try to avoid commenting on all but HH's most blatantly off kilter messages and sermons suggesting dangerous cycling or wacky risk analysis methods. And I don't intend to respond to any questions from HH since long ago it has been clear he only wants to badger anyone who doesn't buy into his theories or provide the correct (i.e. his) answer to his polls and leading questions. I'll let others seek smarmy praise for providing the correct answer.

Get over it, there are only a few remaining intelligent people who choose to continue to respond to your badgering, sermonizing and loaded polls.