View Single Post
Old 09-25-05, 10:35 AM
  #25  
Starclimber
Blue Straggler
 
Starclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Delta
Posts: 1,187

Bikes: Miele Pisasheeta, Airborne Thunderbolt

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown

Well, a thinner tire will have lower rolling resistance. If rolling resistance is a high priority for you, you should buy thinner tires to begin with, rather than starting out with thick tires and counting on them to wear thin.


The concept of rotating tires rear to front only makes sense if you are going to replace tires in pairs, but there's no good reason to replace tires in pairs unless you run a different type/size front/rear...and if you do that you wouldn't want to rotate them either!
Agreed, thinner tires have lower rolling resistance. What I'm 'really' saying is that a thin tire will have less rolling resistance as it becomes even thinner. Thus, rotating back to front makes sense if you are trying to achieve the lowest rolling resistance possible, and don't mind waiting a while to do so. I agree that rotating front to rear makes more sense for most riders. I discovered the 'benefits' of reverse rotation via poverty: my rear tire was getting mighty thin, but my wallet was even thinner. So, I swapped the tires. Eventually, both tires were thrashed, I bought new tires eagerly anticipating improved performance...and to my dismay, the new tires made me slower! Yes, same tires...Specialized Turbo R's, back in the '80s.


Hopefully this clarifies my stance on this issue. I'm odd, but not stupid or insane. Usually.

Bill 'Not Afraid to be Inquisitively Eccentric' Kipper
__________________
Coach Bill
Starclimber is offline